JCT Clause 6.5.1 Insurance
Joint Contracts Tribunal (JCT) Clause 6.5.1 of the Standard Building Contract and Minor Works Contract places a requirement on the contractor to organise insurance both for themselves and the client.
This insurance provides cover should there be damage to a neighbouring property due to the works that are carried out, and the cause of which is not the result of negligence.
The case of ‘Gold v Fotheringham’ [1958] set the precedent that the employer of a contractor is responsible for any damage caused to third parties and may be liable to pay compensation.
The contractor will probably already be required to hold public liability insurance, as will an architect, along with professional indemnity insurance, but these policies only indemnify them if the damage has arisen from their own negligence. However, there may be damage with no clear negligence. For example, a neighbouring building may start subsiding a few weeks after demolition works have taken place correctly and professionally. The owner of the damaged building will likely be insured under their buildings policy, but those insurers will be keen to recover costs from another party, i.e. the employer of the contractor.
The insurance is generally obtained by the contractor on behalf of the employer, with both names on the policy. This is a requirement of the contract, and the contractor will include it within their quoted price to carry out the works as a whole. The employer will typically be responsible for both the premium and any excess payable in the event of a claim.
The risks that are covered are named within the JCT Contract as:
- Collapse.
- Subsidence.
- Heave.
- Vibration.
- Weakening or removal of support.
- Lowering of groundwater.
NB The insurance terms of JCT 2016 are found in Clause 6 and Schedule 3. There are five main types of insurance that may be required:
- Employers’ liability insurance – which protects against Employers' liability for injury of employees arising in connection with their employment (clauses 6.1 – 6.4 JCT 2016).
- Insurance against non-negligent withdrawal of support – which covers potential structural damage to neighbouring property caused by the withdrawal of support (clause 6.5).
- Insurance of the works and of existing structures – which covers physical damage to the works, site materials and existing structures (if there are any) (clauses 6.7 to 6.11 and Schedule 3 JCT 2016) – discussed in detail below.
- Public liability insurance – which covers liability arising from death or personal injury to, or damage to property belonging to, third parties (clauses 6.1 – 6.4 JCT 2016).
- Professional indemnity insurance – which insures against liability arising from professional negligence. Architects, engineers and other professional consultants that owe a design responsibility to the Employer are usually required to maintain such insurance (clauses 6.15 and 6.16 JCT 2016).
[edit] Find out more
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Contractors’ all-risk insurance.
- Damage caused by construction works.
- Employer's liability insurance.
- Insurance.
- Joint names policy.
- Latent defects insurance.
- Making sure your builder has appropriate insurance.
- Professional Indemnity Insurance.
- Public liability insurance.
- Risk register.
- Run-off cover.
Featured articles and news
The act of preservation may sometimes be futile.
Twas the site before Christmas...
A rhyme for the industry and a thankyou to our supporters.
Plumbing and heating systems in schools
New apprentice pay rates coming into effect in the new year
Addressing the impact of recent national minimum wage changes.
EBSSA support for the new industry competence structure
The Engineering and Building Services Skills Authority, in working group 2.
Notes from BSRIA Sustainable Futures briefing
From carbon down to the all important customer: Redefining Retrofit for Net Zero Living.
Principal Designer: A New Opportunity for Architects
ACA launches a Principal Designer Register for architects.
A new government plan for housing and nature recovery
Exploring a new housing and infrastructure nature recovery framework.
Leveraging technology to enhance prospects for students
A case study on the significance of the Autodesk Revit certification.
Fundamental Review of Building Regulations Guidance
Announced during commons debate on the Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report.
CIAT responds to the updated National Planning Policy Framework
With key changes in the revised NPPF outlined.
Councils and communities highlighted for delivery of common-sense housing in planning overhaul
As government follows up with mandatory housing targets.